A recent meeting between veteran Indian politician Sharad Pawar and his nephew Ajit Pawar has triggered speculation and unrest within the political landscape of Maharashtra. The meeting, held at a Pune businessman’s residence, has raised eyebrows as it comes amid growing tensions within the opposition alliance formed by Congress, NCP, and Shiv Sena, headed by Chief Minister Uddhav Balasaheb Thackeray.
The backdrop of the meeting centers on the rift between the factions that emerged after Ajit Pawar and eight other NCP leaders aligned with the Eknath Shinde-led government, backed by the BJP. As both factions vie for control over the NCP, the recent meeting has added fuel to the fire.
Sharad Pawar, a prominent figure in the opposition’s INDIA bloc, has categorically denied reports suggesting he was offered a Union Ministerial post in exchange for abandoning the alliance and aligning with the BJP. Despite speculation surrounding the meeting, Pawar dismissed any such intentions and stated that he remains committed to his current course.
Pawar clarified that while the meeting did occur, it was a customary interaction between family members. He emphasized that he holds the position of seniority within the party, thereby raising questions about the validity of any external offer.
The meeting’s repercussions have caused unease within the Congress-NCP-Shiv Sena alliance. Sanjay Raut, a close aide of Uddhav Thackeray, referred to Sharad Pawar as the “Bhishma Pitamaha” (wise patriarch) of Maharashtra politics and urged him not to take actions that could sow doubt among the populace.
This tension within the alliance is particularly inconvenient as the INDIA bloc gears up for their next meeting in Mumbai. Sharad Pawar confirmed that the meeting is scheduled for August 31, followed by a sabha the next day.
Pawar has not refrained from criticizing the BJP, alleging that the party is actively trying to disrupt elected governments. He cited examples from Goa, Madhya Pradesh, and Maharashtra where the BJP’s involvement led to political turmoil.
He also accused the central government of pursuing divisive tactics, referring to a recent circular designating August 14 as “partition horrors remembrance day.” Pawar expressed concerns that this move could perpetuate bitterness and division among the masses.
Despite the speculation and unease, Sharad Pawar continues to assert his dedication to his party’s principles and the alliance. As Maharashtra’s political landscape undergoes these shifts, the implications for both regional and national dynamics remain to be seen. The meeting has left many wondering about the course of action that will be taken by the veteran leader and the impact it could have on the existing political equilibrium.
Sources By Agencies
