In a scathing critique of the growing trend of bulldozer demolitions targeting individuals accused in criminal cases, the Madhya Pradesh High Court has rebuked civic authorities, stating that it has become “fashionable” to demolish homes without due process. The remarks were made by the Indore bench of the high court earlier this month in response to a case involving the demolition of Rahul Langri’s residence in Ujjain.
Rahul Langri, facing charges of causing hurt to extort property, had his two-storey house razed by authorities following his arrest and imprisonment. The demolition, which took place without proper notice or opportunity for Langri and his family to defend themselves, prompted Langri’s wife, Radha, to petition the court. She argued that the demolition was illegal and unjustified as their house was not in violation of any laws and was registered with the housing board.
In a significant ruling, Justice Vivek Rusia deemed the demolition illegal and awarded compensation of ₹1 lakh each to Radha Langri and her mother-in-law, Vimla Gurjar. Furthermore, the court directed action against civic officials responsible for the demolition, highlighting the need for accountability in such actions.
The court expressed dismay over the increasing trend of demolishing homes without affording proper opportunities for regularization. Instead of resorting to demolitions, the court emphasized the importance of providing owners with avenues to rectify any legal irregularities in their constructions.
Radha Langri, expressing relief at the court’s decision, denounced the arbitrary use of bulldozer action, asserting that it unfairly punishes innocent family members for the actions of an individual. She stressed the need for justice and fairness in dealing with such matters, urging authorities to exercise discretion and compassion in their actions.
Echoing her sentiments, Tehzeeb Khan, counsel for the petitioners, emphasized that the actions of a single individual should not result in the collective punishment of an entire family. He underscored the importance of upholding principles of justice and proportionality in dealing with legal matters.
The case underscores broader concerns regarding the misuse of demolition as a punitive measure and highlights the imperative for authorities to adhere to principles of natural justice and fairness in their actions. As the petitioners prepare to seek further recourse in civil court for additional compensation, the ruling serves as a reminder of the judiciary’s role in upholding the rights and dignity of citizens in the face of administrative excesses.
Sources By Agencies
