“Supreme Court Rejects Bail Pleas of Bilkis Bano Convicts, Questions Validity”

Date:

Supreme Court Rejects Bail Pleas of Bilkis Bano Convicts
New Delhi, April 24 (ANI): Gujarat gang-rape survivor Bilkis Yakub Rasool Bano during a press conference at Press Club of India in New Delhi, on Wednesday. Bano was gang-raped during the 2002 riots. (ANI Photo)

The Supreme Court of India has rejected the interim bail petitions filed by Radheyshyam Bhagwandas and Rajubhai Babulal, two men convicted of raping Bilkis Bano and killing her family during the 2002 Gujarat riots. The court’s decision on Friday came after the two convicts sought temporary release pending the Supreme Court’s ruling on a new remission plea challenging the court’s January 8 verdict.

Bhagwandas and Babulal, who were convicted for their roles in the horrific gang rape and murder case, had requested bail until the court could address their fresh remission plea. This plea challenged the earlier January ruling, which had overturned their release granted by the Gujarat government on Independence Day in 2022.

In their appeal, Bhagwandas and Babulal contended that the January verdict contradicted a 2002 order by the Constitution bench and sought to have the matter referred to a larger bench. They argued that the conflicting decisions by different Supreme Court benches had created confusion regarding the state’s authority to grant early release. They requested the court to clarify which judgment—the one from May 2022 or the January 2024 ruling—should be applied.

The Supreme Court, however, dismissed their petitions, with Justice Sanjiv Khanna criticizing the pleas as “absolutely misconceived” and inappropriate for consideration in a public interest litigation. The court maintained that it was not in a position to review or appeal its own decisions on this matter.

The January ruling had been highly critical of the Gujarat government’s premature release of the convicts, noting that the release was based on a superseded 1992 remission policy. The court emphasized that the convicts should have remained in jail, and the Gujarat government had overstepped its jurisdiction by granting remission.

In August 2022, the Gujarat government had released the 11 convicts—serving life sentences—based on a 1992 remission policy and their “good conduct,” but this decision was later overturned by the Supreme Court.

Sources By Agencies

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Share post:

Subscribe

spot_imgspot_img

Popular

More like this
Related

Karnataka Cabinet Approves Funding Plan for Bengaluru Business Corridor Project

The Karnataka State Cabinet has approved a proposal to secure long-term loans to fund the ambitious Bengaluru Business Corridor project, previously known as the Peripheral Ring Road (PRR). This decision comes after two international tenders failed to attract bidders, prompting the state government to take charge of the project.

Fresh Manipur Violence Leaves 6 Dead, Bunkers Demolished, Helicopters Patrolling

Six people were killed in a fresh wave of violence in Manipur’s Jiribam district early this morning, according to police reports. The renewed clashes have escalated tensions in the region, already marred by ethnic unrest between the Meitei and Kuki communities.

Kolkata: ED Raids Put Former RG Kar Principal Sandip Ghosh’s Luxurious Bungalow Under Investigation

In a major development linked to financial misconduct allegations at RG Kar Medical College and Hospital, the Enforcement Directorate (ED) conducted extensive raids at multiple locations tied to former principal Sandip Ghosh. The probe gained momentum on Friday when Ghosh’s lavish farmhouse-cum-bungalow in Madhya Narayanpur, Canning, came under scrutiny. Ghosh is currently in CBI custody over charges of financial irregularities during his tenure at the state-run hospital.

“Wants to Convert…”: UP Principal Expels 5-Year-Old Student for Bringing Non-Veg Tiffin

A private school in Uttar Pradesh's Amroha has come under scrutiny after a five-year-old student was expelled for allegedly bringing non-vegetarian food to class. The incident, which occurred on Teachers' Day, gained widespread attention after a video of a heated argument between the student's mother and the school principal went viral on social media.